From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17018 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 07:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17010 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2011 07:46:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail201c2.megamailservers.com (HELO mail201c2.megamailservers.com) (69.49.111.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:45:50 +0000 X-Authenticated-User: konrad.gaisler.com Received: from [192.168.0.37] (gaisler.se [92.33.28.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail201c2.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pBC7jNv2015828; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:45:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE5AF4D.4070101@gaisler.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:46:00 -0000 From: Konrad Eisele User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Yann E. MORIN" CC: crossgcc@sourceware.org, Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0 References: <4EDC86E4.6030202@gaisler.com> <201112112236.56313.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> In-Reply-To: <201112112236.56313.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=3vroozmhezBP+7RX62VLXHfNRE6fEyW8fj8TCBGQ830= c=1 sm=1 a=CIB-vgOadyEA:10 a=J_fnW-vIlMEA:10 a=U62ajLuCel8A:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=jXKJviUpWSOlMmIvGrHOfw==:17 a=hhmlESSu5_CTtSkONCQA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jXKJviUpWSOlMmIvGrHOfw==:117 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Konrad, All, > > On Monday 05 December 2011 09:55:00 Konrad Eisele wrote: >> Here is a seperated patch for gcc 4.6.0 + binutils 2.21.1 for >> SPARC-LEON. > > As said in other replies, I think this should go upstream. Is there a gcc-maintainer that you could ask to pull the leon patches? I tried to get them in but I didnt succeed. There are so many people with so many opinions. Mike Frysinger (who think it should go upstreams) for instance had a lot of comments on a newlibc patch I sent but in the end it is left unapplied anyway, so I wonder if there is a meaning in continuing. Lets close the topic, I can live with external patches for now. -- Konrad -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq