Happy new year.

I've resubmitted both "patches" I submitted earlier, but now (hopefully)
in the proper format.


On 01/02/2014 09:55 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Niels, All,
>
> Happy New Year to all!
>
> On 2014-01-02 10:37 +0100, Niels Penneman spake thusly:
>> You have added the BINUTILS_2_24_or_later symbol in Kconfig but
>> unfortunately BINUTILS_V_2_24 does not select it. You also did not mark
>> it as experimental; perhaps the latter was intended.
> Doh, it seems that comitting stuff on New Year's Eve was a bad idea to
> begin with! :-/
>
> Thanks for spotting this! :-)
>
>> Here's a "suggestion":
> Thanks for the "suggestion"!
>
> But, could you please send a 'proper' patch, with subject, commit log
> and your Signed-off-by line, like, for example:
>     https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2014-01/msg00006.html
>
> You can use 'hg email' to send your patches. See:
>     docs/7 - Contributing to crosstool-NG.txt
>
> and section titled 'Using Mercurial to hack crosstool-NG' in:
>     docs/C - Misc. tutorials.txt
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
> PS. I did not see that you did provide the binutils 2.23.2 patch, hence
> the reason I did not credit you as being the author. Apologies... :-(
> Also, that patch was not properly prepared (see above).
> YEM.
>
>> ======
>> diff --git a/config/binutils/binutils.in b/config/binutils/binutils.in
>> index 64ce389..e007e3c 100644
>> --- a/config/binutils/binutils.in
>> +++ b/config/binutils/binutils.in
>> @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ choice
>>  
>>  config BINUTILS_V_2_24
>>      bool
>> -    prompt "2.24"
>> +    prompt "2.24 (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> +    depends on EXPERIMENTAL
>> +    select BINUTILS_2_24_or_later
>>  
>>  config BINUTILS_V_2_23_2
>>      bool
>> ======
>>
>>
>> On 12/31/2013 12:46 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>>> Yann, All,
>>>
>>> Your patch:
>>>     binutils/binutils: 2.23.2 is a 2_23_or_later (ie. has gold)
>>>
>>> has been applied as: #7b7d953f9cfb
>>>     http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/crosstool-ng/rev/7b7d953f9cfb
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yann E. MORIN.
> PPS: In case someone wondered: this was an automatic mail, I'm not
> narcissistic enough to send myself a congratulation mail! ;-)
>
> That kind of mail is sent as soon as I'm not the author, or someone else
> than me signed-off (or reported, or acked or added any other sob-line)
> on the patch.
> YEM.
>