From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26889 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2014 16:47:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26848 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2014 16:47:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: www.zacarias.com.ar Received: from www.zacarias.com.ar (HELO www.zacarias.com.ar) (62.210.192.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:47:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.27.2] (cpe-186-23-17-245.telecentro-reversos.com.ar [186.23.17.245] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by www.zacarias.com.ar (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9SGl8Fw021688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:47:11 GMT Message-ID: <544FC887.1000900@zacarias.com.ar> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:47:00 -0000 From: Gustavo Zacarias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sophie Leray , crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: e300c4 powerpc cpu support : Unknown cpu used in --with-cpu=e300c4 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2014 11:52 AM, Sophie Leray wrote: > Hi, > > I have to build a cross toolchain for the MPC837x which is based on > the e300c4 cpu. > > I have followed the sample exemple to build a cross toolchain for the > e300c3 cpu, and that works! > But when I only changed (in Target optimisations) the "Emit assembly > for CPU"(--with-cpu) and "Tune for CPU"(--with-tune) fields by > "e300c4", build failed and printed Hi. For all intents and purposes the e300c4 is the same as the e300c3, it just has a bigger L1 cache. Explicit support for the e300c4 was never added to vanilla gcc, but if it were it would probably just be an alias for e300c3. Regards. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq