From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15871 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 13:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 15859 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 13:42:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.w4a.fr (HELO mx1.w4a.fr) (178.33.204.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:42:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.w4a.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE826A08A; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:42:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.w4a.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.w4a.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tD8yDNfvknM6; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:42:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.w4a.fr (mx1.w4a.fr [178.33.204.49]) by mx1.w4a.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711B26A098; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:42:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:42:00 -0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_TH=C3=89BAUDEAU?= To: "Yann E. MORIN" Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [CT-NG 1.11.1] eglibc internationalization support Message-ID: <5cc58a4b-c693-436e-8430-441928c79c04@mx-12> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 Hi Yann, all, Does somebody have suggestions/comments/preferences or need more time to answer, or should I propose a patch first, then discuss? Regards, Beno=C3=AEt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Beno=C3=AEt TH=C3=89BAUDEAU" > To: "Yann E. MORIN" > Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org > Sent: Monday, June 6, 2011 7:32:06 PM > Subject: Re: [CT-NG 1.11.1] eglibc internationalization support > > Hi Yann, all! > > > > I have nothing important to say about it for now. Looks good. > > > With the add-ons selection chmanges on-going, I thinks that it > > > should > > > be > > > added as an available add-on. > > > > Sure, but as an add-on handled automatically by CT-NG like nptl > > (this > > is > > what my patch does), or as an optional add-on from > > CT_LIBC_ADDONS_LIST? > > > > Also note that it is possible to limit the set of locales to > > install > > with > > SUPPORTED-LOCALES, but I'm note sure adding such a config would be > > very > > useful for CT-NG. > > I have briefly looked at glibc's and eglibc's Makefiles. Both have a > localedata/install-locales target, but apparently only for native > builds > since they use the built localedef. A host localedef is required in > order > to install the locales, hence eglibc's localedef add-on. > Unfortunately, > there doesn't seem to be such an add-on for glibc. > > The options for eglibc are: > 1) Use the localedef add-on. > 2) Use a pre-installed host version of localedef. > > The options for glibc are: > 1) Use eglibc's localedef add-on if it works, but it's probably > better to > avoid mixing packages. > 2) Use a pre-installed host version of localedef. > 3) Do not support installing target locales, which would be a shame. > > I think 2) would be the best for both since it would avoid > eglibc/glibc > branches. The host localedef would be detected by CT-NG's configure. > > Do you think the installation of locales should be mandatory, or a > config > option? > > Do you think that the list of locales to install should be a > configuration, > or that all locales should be installed? > > Tools like BuildRoot have an option to purge the target locales > installed > from a toolchain, so too many config options concerning locales is > perhaps > useless for CT-NG. > > Tell me what you think. > > Regards, > Beno=C3=AEt -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq