From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30374 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 18:58:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30365 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 18:58:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail02.prevas.se (HELO mail02.prevas.se) (62.95.78.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:58:21 +0000 Received: from prevas14.prevas.se ([172.16.8.41]) by ironport2.prevas.se with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 24 Apr 2012 20:57:51 +0200 Received: from dev.prevas.dk ([172.16.10.60]) by prevas14.prevas.se over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:54:29 +0200 Received: from arh128 (0x55532124.adsl.cybercity.dk [85.83.33.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eha) by dev.prevas.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E887C7FDC1; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by arh128 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F40C587584; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:57:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Esben Haabendal To: "Yann E. MORIN" Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Request for testing: canadian rework References: <201204162355.07157.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <87y5pox6t7.fsf@dev.prevas.dk> <201204232324.48346.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201204232324.48346.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:24:48 +0200") Message-ID: <878vhlj6tu.fsf@dev.prevas.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 "Yann E. MORIN" writes: > Esben, All, > > On Saturday 21 April 2012 20:45:24 Esben Haabendal wrote: >> "Yann E. MORIN" writes: >> >> > Changes (from 4.000 feet high): >> > - no need for a pre-exisiting x-compiler for the target >> > - a complete x-compiler for target is built for internal use, but is not >> > exported for the user to use >> >> Will it still be possible to use a pre-existing x-compiler for target? >> >> When building let's say 3 canadian-cross crompilers, fx. >> >> i686-linux -> arm-linux >> x86_64-linux -> arm-linux >> mingw32 -> arm-linux >> >> It would be nice to be able to not have to build the same target >> x-compiler three times. > > Ah, I did not think of this use-case... No, the new infra will not allow > that. The whole purpose was to get rid of the separate cross-compiler build, > to be able to build the canadian cross in one run (except of course the > cross- compiler for the host which is needed anyway to cross-build all the > other stuff for the host). > > I believe this will be easy to re-add in the next release, though. The code > was there anyway, it's just a matter to re-enable it. > > Thanks for the suggestion! Great, I will look forward to that, so I don't have to get stuck on an old version of ct-NG :-) /Esben -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq