Mingw build.

Mingw build.

[Bill Pringlemeir]

I have a 'Canadian' cross of x64-linux build, i386-mingw host and
arm-linux target.  Esben Haabendal posted a patch here,

 http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-03/msg00159.html

I looked through the current 'hg' code for a 'caddr' patch.

 cat $CTNG/glibc/2.13/910-typedef-caddr.patch | patch -p1

I ran this in .build/src/eglibc-2_16/ and all the hunks passed.  Without
this, ct-ng was failing in the final steps.  It has been since Mar 2011,
since this was reported.  Does anyone know what the issue is?

Ie, should glibc/eglibc have this patch?  Has it been refused?  Or is
there some sort of 'autotools' bug as alluded to in the thread above?

Thanks,
Bill Pringlemeir.


--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Re: Mingw build.

[Esben Haabendal]

Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca> writes:

> I have a 'Canadian' cross of x64-linux build, i386-mingw host and
> arm-linux target.  Esben Haabendal posted a patch here,
>
>  http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-03/msg00159.html
>
> I looked through the current 'hg' code for a 'caddr' patch.
>
>  cat $CTNG/glibc/2.13/910-typedef-caddr.patch | patch -p1
>
> I ran this in .build/src/eglibc-2_16/ and all the hunks passed.  Without
> this, ct-ng was failing in the final steps.  It has been since Mar 2011,
> since this was reported.  Does anyone know what the issue is?
>
> Ie, should glibc/eglibc have this patch?  Has it been refused?  Or is
> there some sort of 'autotools' bug as alluded to in the thread above?

Hi Bill

What ct-NG version are you using?

/Esben

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Re: Mingw build.

[Bill Pringlemeir]

> Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca> writes:

>> I have a 'Canadian' cross of x64-linux build, i386-mingw host and
>> arm-linux target.  Esben Haabendal posted a patch here,

>> http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-03/msg00159.html

[snip] 

>> Ie, should glibc/eglibc have this patch?  Has it been refused?  Or is
>> there some sort of 'autotools' bug as alluded to in the thread above?

On 26 Feb 2013, esben.haabendal@dev.prevas.dk wrote:

> What ct-NG version are you using?

I have an 'hg' version between 1.17 and 1.18 specifically with the host
compile using '-O2', maybe a few commits after.  I can get the specific
commit if you like?  I don't have access to the machine now.

Thanks,
Bill.

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Re: Mingw build.

[Esben Haabendal]

Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca> writes:

>> Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca> writes:
>
>>> I have a 'Canadian' cross of x64-linux build, i386-mingw host and
>>> arm-linux target.  Esben Haabendal posted a patch here,
>
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-03/msg00159.html
>
> [snip] 
>
>>> Ie, should glibc/eglibc have this patch?  Has it been refused?  Or is
>>> there some sort of 'autotools' bug as alluded to in the thread above?
>
> On 26 Feb 2013, esben.haabendal@dev.prevas.dk wrote:
>
>> What ct-NG version are you using?
>
> I have an 'hg' version between 1.17 and 1.18 specifically with the host
> compile using '-O2', maybe a few commits after.  I can get the specific
> commit if you like?  I don't have access to the machine now.

Hi Bill

I believe that most versions of glibc should be patched with the ct-NG
version you are using.  But eglibc needs to have this patch also.

/Esben

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq