From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31192 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2014 18:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31173 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2014 18:33:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f169.google.com Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:33:44 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so2019568wes.0 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:33:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.170 with SMTP id s10mr5838857wia.35.1393439620337; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:33:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.206.2 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:33:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530E2237.50603@linaro.org> References: <530E2237.50603@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multilib-list From: Ray Donnelly To: Trevor Woerner Cc: "crossgcc@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 Hi Trevor, AFAIK --with-multilib-list is only supported on intel and sh and in GCC 4.9 it's also supported for arm. If you're interested in multilib support, a few of us have been contributing to the following patch queue: https://bitbucket.org/bhundven/crosstool-ng-multilib On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The help text for crosstool-NG's MULTILIB configuration option states: > > "The list of variants is dependent on the architecture, and is > hard-coded in gcc, so it is not possible to say what variants to > support, only whether hard-coded variants should be supported or not." > > Isn't this the purpose of gcc's --with-multilib-list option? Doesn't > this allow the user to select which multilib variants to build? > > Best regards, > Trevor > > -- > For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq > -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq