* [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20
@ 2009-11-11 22:52 Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:52 ` [PATCH 1 of 1] patches/binutils/2.20: make patches appliable Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:56 ` [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Roussel @ 2009-11-11 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann E. MORIN; +Cc: crossgcc
Hi,
While trying to build for binutils-2.20, I noticed that some patch files did not apply properly. Those are proposed fixes.
Thanks all,
--Frederic
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1 of 1] patches/binutils/2.20: make patches appliable
2009-11-11 22:52 [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Frederic Roussel
@ 2009-11-11 22:52 ` Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:56 ` [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Yann E. MORIN
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Roussel @ 2009-11-11 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann E. MORIN; +Cc: crossgcc
# HG changeset patch
# User "Frederic Roussel" <fr.frasc@gmail.com>
# Date 1257979493 28800
# Node ID 60446d2e5660ca85a6f1b31bc2abf30b98657f0b
# Parent 187e06178dcbe8a15147bb057e7242d5dccd8309
patches/binutils/2.20: make patches appliable
Fix filenames in patch files for binutils-2.20.
Some patch files were only usable with patch argument '-p0'.
Fix the diff context to match 2.20 release.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Roussel <fr.frasc@gmail.com>
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/100-ppc64-pie.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/100-ppc64-pie.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/100-ppc64-pie.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---- bfd/elf64-ppc.c.jj 2004-09-27 16:46:06.000000000 -0400
-+++ bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2004-10-04 09:09:50.000000000 -0400
+--- binutils/bfd/elf64-ppc.c.jj 2004-09-27 16:46:06.000000000 -0400
++++ binutils/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2004-10-04 09:09:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -9681,7 +9681,12 @@ ppc64_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_
else if (!SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL (info, &h->elf)
&& !is_opd
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/110-RPATH_ENVVAR-smack.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/110-RPATH_ENVVAR-smack.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/110-RPATH_ENVVAR-smack.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-07/msg00401.html
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4970
---- configure
-+++ configure
+--- binutils/configure
++++ binutils/configure
@@ -5601,6 +5601,7 @@ case "${host}" in
*-*-mingw* | *-*-cygwin ) RPATH_ENVVAR=PATH ;;
*) RPATH_ENVVAR=LD_LIBRARY_PATH ;;
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/120-sh-targets.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/120-sh-targets.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/120-sh-targets.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -1,22 +1,15 @@
-r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines
-
-Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we
-fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for
-sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more
-inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise).
-
---- binutils-2.16.90.0.2-dist/configure
-+++ binutils-2.16.90.0.2/configure
-@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@
+--- binutils-2.20-dist/configure
++++ binutils-2.20/configure
+@@ -3054,7 +3054,7 @@
am33_2.0-*-linux*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
;;
- sh-*-linux*)
+ sh*-*-linux*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
- ;;
+ ;;
sh*-*-pe|mips*-*-pe|*arm-wince-pe)
-@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@
+@@ -3390,7 +3390,7 @@
romp-*-*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs bfd binutils ld gas opcodes target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
;;
@@ -25,8 +18,8 @@
case "${host}" in
i[3456789]86-*-vsta) ;; # don't add gprof back in
i[3456789]86-*-go32*) ;; # don't add gprof back in
---- binutils-2.16.90.0.2-dist/configure.ac
-+++ binutils-2.16.90.0.2/configure.ac
+--- binutils-2.20-dist/configure.ac
++++ binutils-2.20/configure.ac
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
am33_2.0-*-linux*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/130-ld-sysroot.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/130-ld-sysroot.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/130-ld-sysroot.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
http://bugs.gentoo.org/275666
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10340
---- ld/ldfile.c
-+++ ld/ldfile.c
+--- binutils/ld/ldfile.c
++++ binutils/ld/ldfile.c
@@ -308,18 +308,24 @@
directory first. */
if (! entry->is_archive)
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/140-check_ldrunpath_length.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/140-check_ldrunpath_length.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/140-check_ldrunpath_length.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad /home/james/debian/packages/binutils/new/binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
--- /home/james/debian/packages/binutils/new/binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-05-21 23:12:58.000000000 +0100
-+++ binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-05-21 23:12:59.000000000 +0100
++++ binutils-2.20/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2004-05-21 23:12:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -692,6 +692,8 @@
&& command_line.rpath == NULL)
{
@@ -43,5 +43,5 @@
+ if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
+ rpath = NULL;
if (! (bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections
- (output_bfd, command_line.soname, rpath,
+ (link_info.output_bfd, command_line.soname, rpath,
command_line.filter_shlib,
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/170-warn-textrel.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/170-warn-textrel.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/170-warn-textrel.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
* ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp (default_ld_simple_link): Scrub TEXTREL
warnings from ld output.
---- bfd/elflink.c
-+++ bfd/elflink.c
+--- binutils/bfd/elflink.c
++++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c
@@ -8652,14 +8652,12 @@
goto error_return;
@@ -38,14 +38,14 @@
break;
}
}
---- ld/ldmain.c
-+++ ld/ldmain.c
+--- binutils/ld/ldmain.c
++++ binutils/ld/ldmain.c
@@ -282,2 +282,3 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
link_info.spare_dynamic_tags = 5;
+ link_info.warn_shared_textrel = TRUE;
link_info.sharable_sections = FALSE;
---- ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp
-+++ ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp
+--- binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp
++++ binutils/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp
@@ -181,6 +181,10 @@ proc default_ld_simple_link { ld target
# symbol, since the default linker script might use ENTRY.
regsub -all "(^|\n)(\[^\n\]*: warning: cannot find entry symbol\[^\n\]*\n?)" $exec_output "\\1" exec_output
diff -r 187e06178dcb -r 60446d2e5660 patches/binutils/2.20/230-libiberty-pic.patch
--- a/patches/binutils/2.20/230-libiberty-pic.patch Fri Oct 30 20:08:44 2009 +0100
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20/230-libiberty-pic.patch Wed Nov 11 14:44:53 2009 -0800
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---- libiberty/Makefile.in.mps 2004-05-13 15:53:17.000000000 +0200
-+++ libiberty/Makefile.in 2004-05-13 15:52:53.000000000 +0200
+--- binutils/libiberty/Makefile.in.mps 2004-05-13 15:53:17.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils/libiberty/Makefile.in 2004-05-13 15:52:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ $(TARGETLIB): $(REQUIRED_OFILES) $(EXTRA
$(AR) $(AR_FLAGS) $(TARGETLIB) \
$(REQUIRED_OFILES) $(EXTRA_OFILES) $(LIBOBJS); \
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20
2009-11-11 22:52 [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:52 ` [PATCH 1 of 1] patches/binutils/2.20: make patches appliable Frederic Roussel
@ 2009-11-11 22:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2009-11-11 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Roussel; +Cc: crossgcc
Frederic,
All,
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 23:47:43 Frederic Roussel wrote:
> While trying to build for binutils-2.20, I noticed that some patch
> files did not apply properly. Those are proposed fixes.
Oh! You beat me at it! :-)
Thank you! Will aply shortly...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
`------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-11 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-11 22:52 [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:52 ` [PATCH 1 of 1] patches/binutils/2.20: make patches appliable Frederic Roussel
2009-11-11 22:56 ` [PATCH 0 of 1] Fix patch files for binutils-2.20 Yann E. MORIN
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).