From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22353 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2010 21:32:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22339 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2010 21:32:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from av9-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (HELO av9-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net) (81.228.8.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:32:35 +0000 Received: by av9-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BB9D8385DA; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av9-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F033385D9; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from isengard (90-224-113-214-no111.tbcn.telia.com [90.224.113.214]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A544437E55; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:32:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by isengard (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 846E036A0C7; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:25:17 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [PATCH 0 of 1] Support for ltrace-0.5.3 in crosstool-NG Message-Id: User-Agent: Mercurial-patchbomb/1.3.1 Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:32:00 -0000 From: Joachim Nilsson To: "Yann E. MORIN" Cc: crossgcc@sourceware.org Mailing-List: contact crossgcc-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Hi Yann! Here is my attempt at adding support for ltrace-0.5.3 to crosstool-NG. Since 0.5.3 and later need a bit of special treatment I've added this ${CT_LTRACE_0_5_3_or_later} to the .config file. Similar to what is done for GCC. Hope this is OK? The patches have been updated and complemented with new ones as well. Most notably the Debian patch and the cross-compile patches from the OpenEmbedded folks. Despite this I did however not get it working, so I added a couple of extra patches to add support for target ARCH and compilation fixes for events.c, on Arm. Yes, I've only tested on Arm, hence the 0.5.3 is marked EXPERIMENTAL. Hopefully there are others that can help out testing on other archs. Regards /Joachim -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq