From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-apps-return-34306-listarch-cygwin-apps=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 2227 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2014 13:14:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com
List-Id: <cygwin-apps.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 2213 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2014 13:14:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mailout2.w1.samsung.com
Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com (HELO mailout2.w1.samsung.com) (210.118.77.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:14:44 +0000
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N2X00LQZZG88T20@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:14:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eusync1.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.211])	by eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 6A.A2.23059.FBF20335; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fedinw7x64 ([106.109.9.113]) by eusync1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0N2X00DYPZGFBK40@eusync1.samsung.com> for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
References: <002201cf44fb$855c9130$9015b390$%fedin@samsung.com> <20140324094131.GA27624@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-reply-to: <20140324094131.GA27624@calimero.vinschen.de>
Subject: RE: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:14:00 -0000
Message-id: <001301cf4763$02e9e0d0$08bda270$%fedin@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

 Hello!

>  So why
> not just provide a single onc-rpc-devel, that should be entirely
> sufficent.

 onc-rpc-headers is obsolete, ignore it. The idea of creating onc-rpc-devel=
 came to me in order to merge headers and rpcgen.


Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia