From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com (mailomta21-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.27]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EB63973009 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:17:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 13EB63973009 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.6]) by sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20210414171703.NCZC14338.sa-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:17:03 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com X-SNCR-Rigid: 6038718206C7268B X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.246] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.246 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeluddgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelieegheeghfevfeevhfdviedugfdvuefhjeehteejffefhfeuudetheeugfffhfenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrudduudgnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegiedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhequceuqfffjgepkeeukffvoffkoffgpdhrtghpthhtohepoegthihgfihinhdqrghpphhssegthihgfihinhdrtghomheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.111] (81.153.98.246) by sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 6038718206C7268B for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:17:03 +0100 Subject: Re: [Attn. Maintainers] prepare your packages for release of perl-5.32 To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <87turpt12x.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87pn1v8xdz.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <87zh0wepsy.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87im7afebs.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <87wnvluqbp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r1lmqz2e.fsf@Otto.invalid> <8735vzwitc.fsf@Otto.invalid> From: Jon Turney Message-ID: <03ee2dd9-1382-9671-3305-32807a9933d5@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:16:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8735vzwitc.fsf@Otto.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3571.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:17:06 -0000 On 09/04/2021 16:58, ASSI wrote: > Jon Turney writes: >>>>> libsolv perl-solv Jon Turney >>> I'd be sad to see this go since I was planning on replacing my >>> hand-written dependency resolution with it. It's not urgent, however. >> >> This was an oversight on my part, rather than deliberate. I rebuilt >> the package for perl 5.30, and then again for perl 5.32. > > Yay! Well, it seems like I intended to rebuild libsolv for perl 5.32, but didn't actually do it, until now... >> ... and you seem to have taken care of all these. > > Indeed. > >> If you are agreeable, I'll add a perl5_026 requirement to the other >> packages listed. > > Please do, that should plug the loophole that could make them > installable without actually working. Ok, this is done. >> I'll also add that requirement to any old perl 5.26-era versions of >> perl distribution packages we still have in the relarea. > > …or vault them since there really isn't any Perl available that can use > them. Your choice. Yes, they should probably get vaulted, but the package staleness determination doesn't take that into account at the moment. What's the status of updating cygport to generate this kind perl requirement automatically, so I never have to think about this again :)?