From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30095 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2012 16:09:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 30079 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2012 16:09:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-ia0-f171.google.com) (209.85.210.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u21so1460805ial.2 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.195.196 with SMTP id ig4mr1381911igc.33.1349971776795; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.200.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10sm4187075igd.1.2012.10.11.09.09.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1349971778.7352.16.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: RFU: keychain 2.7.1-1 (ITA: new maintainer) From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin-apps Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121011095151.GB25617@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <877gr2gmvb.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <50725965.7060302@monai.ca> <87lifhf76h.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <20121009184920.GA5996@pris.crapsteak.org> <874nm2c258.fsf_-_@picasso.cante.net> <20121010090004.GG6605@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121010185227.GA5940@pris.crapsteak.org> <20121011095151.GB25617@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:51 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > No worries. I had completely forgotten the above thread. Looks > like we can safely put the following packages into ORPHANED mode: > > apache-1.x > bsflite > ccdoc > naim > ncftp > tnef > > Jari, I uploaded your keychain package and made you maintainer now. > > As for apache-1.x, I guess this should better go into OBSOLETE, > shouldn't it? IMO it should be removed, as it has been EOLed upstream and is no longer receiving patches even for security vulnerabilities. Yaakov