From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6929 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2012 10:57:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6893 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2012 10:57:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-ia0-f171.google.com) (209.85.210.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:57:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u21so2092434ial.2 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.40.163 with SMTP id y3mr1836025igk.32.1350039427780; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.200.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bh3sm1265493igc.0.2012.10.12.03.57.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1350039432.7352.41.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: [ITA] w32api-3.0b_svn5368-1 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin-apps Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5077F07E.6090709@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20120814073403.GB13181@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120814075611.GC13181@calimero.vinschen.de> <50322A61.1050806@users.sourceforge.net> <505FE11E.5000401@users.sourceforge.net> <506AABBD.2040600@users.sourceforge.net> <20121009100648.GA5469@calimero.vinschen.de> <1349840892.7960.7.camel@YAAKOV04> <20121010082401.GD6605@calimero.vinschen.de> <20121010090920.GK6605@calimero.vinschen.de> <1349931327.7352.3.camel@YAAKOV04> <1349975403.7352.19.camel@YAAKOV04> <5077F07E.6090709@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 18:27 +0800, JonY wrote: > Any thoughts on if I should put up multilib w32api? > I'm having second thoughts now since I realize you can't simply build > them with ootb Cygwin tools. Not only that, but they are also useless with the cygwin compiler, with is currently 32-bit only. IMO w32api should be built with the native gcc4, and configured --enable-lib32 --disable-lib64 until such time that we have a 64-bit Cygwin. Yaakov