From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 114486 invoked by alias); 29 May 2015 20:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 114474 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2015 20:43:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:43:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298C2347A57 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 20:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from YAAKOV04.redhat.com ([10.10.116.23]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4TKhWfF015258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:43:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1432932216.7892.20.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: [ITA] Perl distributions (in preparation of Perl 5.22) From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 20:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87pp5jcg20.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87a8wt3rg0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <877frrdw21.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <1432928655.7892.11.camel@cygwin.com> <1432928761.7892.13.camel@cygwin.com> <87pp5jcg20.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 21:57 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > > In the meantime I did update cygwin-pkg-maint (but next time, patch > > please instead of a new file). > > I'm quite sure I sent a patch? Are you talking about the naming of the > a/b in the patch? https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2015-05/msg00048.html -- Yaakov