From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66414 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2015 18:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 66398 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2015 18:32:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:32:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8F78E761 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 18:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from YAAKOV04.redhat.com ([10.10.116.32]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t65IVxIN006195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 14:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1436121119.1192.2.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: [ITA] Perl distributions (in preparation of Perl 5.22) From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5599306B.40900@cornell.edu> References: <87a8wt3rg0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mvzrfzlp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <1435360174.11720.34.camel@cygwin.com> <1435633541.5276.7.camel@cygwin.com> <87pp488aki.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5598352D.8030603@acm.org> <87bnfr3zwe.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5599306B.40900@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 09:26 -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > On 7/5/2015 2:02 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > > David Rothenberger writes: > >> I've rebuilt the package as curr and not test and uploaded to my area. I > >> did not create the !ready file. > >> > >> Is this the right way to do this? Or should I release a test package? > > > > As long as you remember what you did it's going to be OK. A test > > package might only be needed if someone else asks for it or you need > > testers. > > > > BTW, since we're still not having feedback from Volker Zell, > > We did get feedback from him on a different issue: > > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2015-06/msg00149.html > > So I think it's clear that he won't be rebuilding his packages in the near future. Let's not wait for him. I'll rebuild his packages if necessary. -- Yaakov