From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com (mailomta32-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.125]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918683858C50 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:03:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 918683858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.8]) by re-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20220927160304.DBRM3224.re-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:03:04 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613A91243BA4C97D X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.187] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.187 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeegiedgjeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheduueevueejueejgeeufeehtddtkeevtdduieelfeetteeffeejjedukeefgffgnecuffhomhgrihhnpegthihgfihinhdrtghomhenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrudekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrudekjedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnsehhrghmihhshhhmsgdrtghomh X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (81.153.98.187) by re-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613A91243BA4C97D; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:03:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2003f9ab-e76d-bc0f-ef71-a224949a7d49@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:03:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Subject: Re: Cygwin git should suggest cloning with HTTPS, not HTTP Content-Language: en-GB To: Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty , "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3568.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_LINKBAIT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 27/09/2022 16:37, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote: > Hi there, > > I recently noticed that the git repo pages (for example > https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/2048-cli.git;a=summary) suggest cloning with HTTP, instead of HTTPS. > > HTTPS is available, so this seems like a more secure option to offer > instead of HTTP. Thanks for pointing this out. I've adjusted the gitweb configuration as you suggest.