[ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
feeling in the mood for another gold star ;).  No code changes from -1,
this merely relinks against newer libssl and libintl, adds a preremove
script, and switches to a cygport framework.  OK to upload?

#!/bin/sh
wget `echo '
  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/setup.hint
  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/wget-1.10.2-2.tar.bz2
  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/wget-1.10.2-2-src.tar.bz2
'`

- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFXen984KuGfSFAYARAliAAJ0a9W7da4nTniZXVwsRA97o1oPgzgCggoC4
+aeX61+BAtRZkeHqosahT5U=
=cYEn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
>feeling in the mood for another gold star ;).  No code changes from -1,
>this merely relinks against newer libssl and libintl, adds a preremove
>script, and switches to a cygport framework.  OK to upload?
>
>#!/bin/sh
>wget `echo '
>  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/setup.hint
>  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/wget-1.10.2-2.tar.bz2
>  http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/wget/wget-1.10.2-2-src.tar.bz2
>'`

I'm not even going to check this.  I assume that you will fix any
problems with your usual alacrity, so go ahead and upload.

And, please give the man a gold star.

Which, btw, makes me ask:  Have we missed gold stars for any other
package adopters?  I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.

cgf

RE: [ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[Dave Korn]

On 17 November 2006 17:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:


> Which, btw, makes me ask:  Have we missed gold stars for any other
> package adopters?  I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
> the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.

  :)  Can I have an experimental gold star for having uploaded an experimental
version of gcc and get it upgraded to a real gold star when I upload the new
Curr: version?

(Which is delayed by the need to figure out what's gone wrong with the debug
info, as reported by Angelo G. this morning.)


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: [ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[Jonathan C. Allen]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
> feeling in the mood for another gold star ;).  No code changes from -1,
> this merely relinks against newer libssl and libintl, adds a preremove
> script, and switches to a cygport framework.  OK to upload?

I previously stated my intent to adopt wget, but since you've already
rolled a new package with cygport I'll take it off my list.

jca

Re: [ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2

[Jonathan C. Allen]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:00:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Which, btw, makes me ask:  Have we missed gold stars for any other
> package adopters?  I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
> the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.

I'm due two new stars for ncftp and keychain.  :)

jca

Gold stars galore (Was Re: [ITP-adopt] wget-1.10.2-2)

[Igor Peshansky]

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:57:33AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >I would like to adopt the recently orphaned wget (or maybe I'm just
> >feeling in the mood for another gold star ;).
>
> I'm not even going to check this.  I assume that you will fix any
> problems with your usual alacrity, so go ahead and upload.
>
> And, please give the man a gold star.

Done!  Thanks, Eric.

> Which, btw, makes me ask:  Have we missed gold stars for any other
> package adopters?  I tend to hold off on issuing a gold star until
> the package has already been uploaded so I may have missed somebody.

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Dave Korn wrote:

>   :)  Can I have an experimental gold star for having uploaded an
> experimental version of gcc and get it upgraded to a real gold star when
> I upload the new Curr: version?

By all means.  Unfortunately, I have no time to actually draw the real
"experimental" star, though I do have a design in mind, so I had to
improvise -- hopefully this looks experimental enough... :-)

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Jonathan C. Allen wrote:

> I'm due two new stars for ncftp and keychain.  :)

You've got them, Jon!  Thanks.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"