From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20799 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2008 21:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20788 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2008 21:53:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:52:57 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id D0BE66D4313; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:53:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area Message-ID: <20080408215253.GB8083@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20080402123551.GB4468@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080404004949.GA10978@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080404121534.GB3606@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080408162646.GC23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080408172646.GA2089@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080408174013.GD23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080408184148.GA2448@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080408210726.GA7867@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080408213921.GA728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080408213921.GA728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On Apr 8 17:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:07:26PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >With a dash? cygwin-ng? Like syslog-ng. I was going to suggest this > >too, but I didn't want to copy the naming too bluntly. > > We actually use "ng" internally to Netapp. I actually wanted to call my > project either "ds9" or "voyager" but I got vetoed. I assume Netapp didn't want to risk a law suite with CBS... > >I guess we should use "cygwin-notasnewbutstillnewenough". I'm still > >more leaning towards cygwin-2008. You shouldn't have suggested the > >name. It's all your fault. > > I hate the name! Hate it! > > But I don't really care. cygwin-2008 is fine with me. However, I > predict that cgf-2012 will probably be grumbling about that name > eventually. Looks like Brian made this whole naming discussion obsolete two years ago... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat