From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2469 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2008 19:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2457 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2008 19:35:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-72-74-94-32.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:35:15 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 5E4D22B352; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area Message-ID: <20080413193513.GA13302@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20080409143139.GA5920@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080409162803.GL23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080411151333.GO23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <480014A9.62EF4E0F@dessent.net> <20080412113540.GD23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080412122232.GE23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <4800AF02.DC1B3AF5@dessent.net> <20080412151515.GG23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <48013F76.4D6B8FFC@dessent.net> <20080413094246.GJ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080413094246.GJ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:42:46AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >We would need to transfer them to the new place or we stick to the >"Cygnus Solutions" for backward compatibility. I'm not sure we still >need the Program Options thingy. I never heard about anybody actually >using heap_slop_in_mb and only fortran programmers seem to need >heap_chunk_in_mb :) I use Program Options (since I invented it) but I'm probably the only person in the known universe to do so. >I'm all for changing the name from "Cygnus Solutions" to "Red Hat", but >OTOH I think keeping the name of the key is more hassle free. Can't it just be "Cygwin" rather than "Cygnus Solutions" or "Red Hat"? cgf