From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4934 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2008 09:56:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4922 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2008 09:56:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:56:31 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9E0106D4312; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:56:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:56:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area Message-ID: <20080414095628.GA4069@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20080409162803.GL23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080411151333.GO23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <480014A9.62EF4E0F@dessent.net> <20080412113540.GD23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080412122232.GE23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <4800AF02.DC1B3AF5@dessent.net> <20080412151515.GG23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <48013F76.4D6B8FFC@dessent.net> <20080413094246.GJ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080413193513.GA13302@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080413193513.GA13302@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Apr 13 15:35, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:42:46AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >We would need to transfer them to the new place or we stick to the > >"Cygnus Solutions" for backward compatibility. I'm not sure we still > >need the Program Options thingy. I never heard about anybody actually > >using heap_slop_in_mb and only fortran programmers seem to need > >heap_chunk_in_mb :) > > I use Program Options (since I invented it) but I'm probably the only > person in the known universe to do so. Are you suggesting to remove the Program Options? I admit I never quite understood what to do with them which I couldn't put into a script. > >I'm all for changing the name from "Cygnus Solutions" to "Red Hat", but > >OTOH I think keeping the name of the key is more hassle free. > > Can't it just be "Cygwin" rather than "Cygnus Solutions" or "Red Hat"? By definition the key under the Software key is supposed to be the company name, the next key is the product key, os it should contain the "Red Hat" *iff* we change it. I'm not sure, though, we should change it at all. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat