From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22925 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2008 08:55:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 22913 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2008 08:55:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:55:18 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 469696D4312; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:55:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area Message-ID: <20080415085515.GW23852@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20080412113540.GD23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080412122232.GE23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <4800AF02.DC1B3AF5@dessent.net> <20080412151515.GG23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <48013F76.4D6B8FFC@dessent.net> <20080413094246.GJ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080413193513.GA13302@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080414095628.GA4069@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080414143631.GB18398@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <48041AC2.DA789E78@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48041AC2.DA789E78@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On Apr 14 20:02, Brian Dessent wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > Yes, I know. I just don't think it clarifies anything to put a "Red > > Hat" in the registry. > > I was thinking "Cygwin" would be better as well, but since it is > supposed to be a two-level heirarchy how about > "HK{LM,CU}\Software\Cygwin Project\Cygwin". It has always seemed to me > that we actively try to de-emphasize any association that Red Hat has in > the actual day-to-day operation of the project, other than owning the > copyrights and having their own commercial fork. Likewise with the Well, not exactly. I have done a lot of my 1.7 development lately on blessed Red Hat time. The IPv6 changes and the long path name support wouldn't be as progressed as they are if I hadn't got enough paid time to do them. I don't think that deserves to be ignored. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat