From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-apps-return-23181-listarch-cygwin-apps=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 25593 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2008 22:55:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 25579 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2008 22:55:28 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-72-74-94-32.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.32)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:55:11 +0000
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id A267D2B352; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:55:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:55:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area
Message-ID: <20080420225509.GA15614@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
References: <20080415175923.GA21976@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080415183856.GM23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <4804F929.60401@lapo.it> <20080416093916.GS23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080416162446.GB24767@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080420154525.GA5199@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <480B8F84.7080304@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20080420215617.GA15401@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080420221045.GA15469@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <480BC717.3020209@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <480BC717.3020209@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com
List-Id: <cygwin-apps.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 06:43:35PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Please hold off making any changes to anything in the release-2 area.
>>I want to try another unionfs implementation which doesn't seem to have
>>this problem.
>
>Whoops.
>
>Don't worry, you can blow away my changes.  I've got a handy email that
>lists all the changes I made.  <g>

I think I recreated the area complete with your changes.  Let me know if
I screwed anything up.

This making changes to an area which is actively being rsynced and
potentially being worked on is nerve-wracking.

cgf