From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10843 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2008 18:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10829 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2008 18:59:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-72-74-94-234.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (72.74.94.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:59:12 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 15D291490BF; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:59:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:59:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini Message-ID: <20080909185909.GA21908@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <033001c912a3$e667eeb0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20080909175045.GA21729@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <033401c912a6$16ff21e0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <20080909183523.GA21765@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080909183523.GA21765@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: >>>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin option? If so, I may >>>have to leave work early so that I can have a celebratory beverage. >> >>Sorry :( no beer for you today. It's a fairly straight build of >>released 4.3.0 with just a bit of patching for shared libgcc etc. >> >>Anyway, I'll be doing the upload later tonight after I get home from >>work. I thought it unlikely that the category settings would be >>persisted, but don't want to get caught out by making a dumb >>assumption.... if at all possible ... > >I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the >-mno-cygwin madness. I'd really prefer not releasing a version with >this option even if it is just commented out. Btw, Dave, do you want me to sponsor you as one of the new cygwin-on-windows maintainers? I was suggesting Kai Tietz as another alternative for MinGW. It would be nice to have an active Cygwin maintainer as well. cgf