From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14417 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 17:15:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 14266 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2008 17:15:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-96-237-242-157.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (96.237.242.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:13:55 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3FD13C026 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4E2CB42394E; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:13:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:15:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITA] X.Org X11R7.4 Message-ID: <20081104171345.GA32252@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <490FB8F1.1040107@users.sourceforge.net> <490FC2E5.5B53BEA1@dessent.net> <490FC3FA.B038879C@dessent.net> <490FC59F.5090603@users.sourceforge.net> <20081104042014.GE13544@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <490FCFBE.2000009@users.sourceforge.net> <20081104045906.GF13544@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <490FE43E.3050806@users.sourceforge.net> <20081104150937.GB15309@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <49106F02.6000301@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49106F02.6000301@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:49:22AM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>genini differs from upset in this way, then. You can probably just >>remove that error. > >This is probably where I got the idea that an empty bin was necessary. >I'll just ignore it. > >>I created a setup.ini which had only a -src package and it definitely >>shows up in setup.ini. I didn't try actually running setup.exe on that >>setup.ini but I'd be surprised if it didn't show up. > >By me it shows up in setup.ini, but only the category, sdesc, and ldesc >tags, no install or source tags. You're talking about genini. Look at the code for genini and you'll see why that is the case. upset does not work this way. cgf