From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5397 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2011 15:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5251 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2011 15:34:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-48.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173001pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:34:16 +0000 Received: from stella ([unknown] [108.27.46.146]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LS400F9HZ8P50VB@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:34:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stella.tishler.net) by stella with smtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id LS4Z58-0003Q0-IS for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:31:56 -0400 Received: by stella.tishler.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:31:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:34:00 -0000 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New rebase release Message-id: <20110926153156.GA6076@tishler.net> Mail-followup-to: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <4E778FC2.2070109@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110920152437.GF4836@tishler.net> <4E78B325.9010603@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110923151158.GA3616@tishler.net> <4E7FA96A.20500@cwilson.fastmail.fm> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <4E7FA96A.20500@cwilson.fastmail.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 06:21:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag > > the release? > > "." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed to start with a > number. So, I usually do this: > > x.y.z -> vx_y_z > 4.0.0 -> v4_0_0 Since tags are global to the entire CVS repository, should I prepend the tag with "rebase" to guarantee uniqueness? Thanks, Jason