From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4075 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2011 05:30:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 4061 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2011 05:30:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm24-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO nm24-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.94.236.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:30:16 +0000 Received: from [66.94.237.192] by nm24.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 05:30:15 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.102] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 05:30:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Nov 2011 05:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 65176 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2011 05:30:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@98.110.183.46 with login) by smtp102.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Nov 2011 22:30:14 -0700 PDT Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B1313C0D3 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 01:30:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:30:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] win-ssh-agent 1.07 Message-ID: <20111106053014.GA4667@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20111104030339.GB7994@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:21:28PM -0800, Karl M wrote: >So I don't see a need for win-ssh-agent, unless the OP can identify any use cases not >satisfied by existing options? This is a dead subject. The OP has withdrawn the package.