Octave .oct files and rebaseall

Octave .oct files and rebaseall

[Corinna Vinschen]

Hi Marco,


right now rebaseall only supports DLLs with the suffixes .dll and .so.
But the DLLs under /usr/lib/octave/*/oct/i686-pc-cygwin all have the
suffix .oct.

Should these DLLs be taken into account by rebaseall as well, or is that
not necessary for some reason?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Re: Octave .oct files and rebaseall

[marco atzeri]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 624 bytes --]

On 3/14/2012 5:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
>
> right now rebaseall only supports DLLs with the suffixes .dll and .so.
> But the DLLs under /usr/lib/octave/*/oct/i686-pc-cygwin all have the
> suffix .oct.
>
> Should these DLLs be taken into account by rebaseall as well, or is that
> not necessary for some reason?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>

handling of .oct it will be appreciated.

I am already seeing fork issues around
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/help-octave/2012-March/050766.html

I will also appreciate if you could add a rebaseall.bat
in the cygwin root similar to the attachment.

Marco


[-- Attachment #2: rebaseall.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 390 bytes --]

@echo off

cd bin

@rem dash -l -i -c "echo ' !!  Starting rebasing. Be patient  !! \n' ; rebaseall -s 'dll|so|oct' -T /usr/local/lista_rebase"
dash -l -i -c "echo ' !!  Starting rebasing. Be patient  !! \n' ; rebaseall -s 'dll|so|oct' "


echo .
echo  !!  No rebaseall errors ?  Than done and fine,        !!  
echo  !!  otherwise you have others cygwin process running  !!
echo .

pause

Re: Octave .oct files and rebaseall

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Mar 14 19:26, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 3/14/2012 5:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi Marco,
> >
> >
> >right now rebaseall only supports DLLs with the suffixes .dll and .so.
> >But the DLLs under /usr/lib/octave/*/oct/i686-pc-cygwin all have the
> >suffix .oct.
> >
> >Should these DLLs be taken into account by rebaseall as well, or is that
> >not necessary for some reason?
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Corinna
> >
> 
> handling of .oct it will be appreciated.

Ok, I'll add it to rebaseall.

> I will also appreciate if you could add a rebaseall.bat
> in the cygwin root similar to the attachment.

No, the next release will come with a postinstall script which calls
rebaseall every time a package with DLLs is updated to a new release,
along the same lines as _update-info-dir.

I have this stuff waiting in the scenery, but I'm *desperately* waiting
for feedback from Jason Tishler and/or Charles Wilson for the two
rebase patches.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat