From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25564 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2012 18:55:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 25551 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2012 18:55:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:55:49 +0000 Received: from pool-173-76-44-35.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.76.44.35] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLey4-000Gc4-L0 for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:55:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EFA42800C for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:55:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18JcuoFBjdXGR3ckOkzW3je Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:55:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: upload protocol (Use of GTG?) Message-ID: <20121009185547.GB12602@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20121009165836.GA11886@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87sj9ncxbt.fsf@picasso.cante.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sj9ncxbt.fsf@picasso.cante.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:30:30PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > >On 2012-10-09 12:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: >| Would it make sense to always wait for an "RFU" after an "ITP"? >| As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues >| for when a package is ready for upload. > >Perhaps appending "GTG" to a end of subject would be all that is >needed to mark the thread finished. I meant to mention that one of my reasons for asking is that I'm very slowly working on automating the upload process. I'd rather just scan for one format of email and not have to look for something else. I think it also is important that just because someone says "GTG" it doesn't necessarily mean that the package should be uploaded. That really shoulr require the package owner to initiate the action. IMO. cgf