From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: GCC maintainer volunteer?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130221165907.GG28458@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGHJv4cVjL8iDHoVkv-ThZPvNAkx3ce6YTr01E4ZHKwsM0YE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Feb 21 11:31, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
> >>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
> >>> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
> >>> >> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
> >>> >
> >>> > There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my
> >>> understanding of the gcc internals are limited.
> >>
> >> I assume some (or all) of them are already upstream, but they were not
> >> backported into the 4.5.x branch. It might be a good idea to start out
> >> with a clean upstream build and then look into the patches if they still
> >> make some sense.
> >
> > Are they in 4.6? If so, why not just start fresh and clean with a 4.6
> > 'chain that needs zero patching?
>
> I believe Corinna means going to later version of GCC, preferably
> straight to 4.7 would be great.
Exactly. The question is then, what patches from the 4.5.3 gcc were
not applied upstream and still make sense today.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-21 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 17:16 Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines Dave Korn
2012-11-24 5:54 ` marco atzeri
2012-11-24 9:48 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-01-14 16:50 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2013-01-18 13:32 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-04 10:17 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-18 23:59 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2013-02-19 7:46 ` GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.) Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-19 10:22 ` JonY
2013-02-19 11:46 ` Yaakov
2013-02-19 12:53 ` JonY
2013-02-21 11:53 ` JonY
2013-02-21 12:40 ` NightStrike
2013-02-21 13:34 ` GCC maintainer volunteer? JonY
2013-02-21 13:42 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-21 13:47 ` JonY
2013-02-21 15:39 ` NightStrike
2013-02-21 16:31 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2013-02-21 16:59 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2013-02-21 21:48 ` JonY
2013-02-21 23:48 ` marco atzeri
2013-02-22 5:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-02-22 8:39 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-22 7:31 ` Yaakov
2013-02-22 8:38 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-22 9:18 ` JonY
2013-02-23 15:04 ` JonY
2013-02-23 15:46 ` Ken Brown
2013-02-24 1:12 ` JonY
2013-02-24 1:39 ` Ken Brown
2013-02-24 2:02 ` JonY
2013-02-24 4:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-02-24 5:22 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2013-02-25 14:40 ` JonY
2013-02-25 18:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-02-27 12:06 ` JonY
2013-02-27 13:11 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-27 13:29 ` JonY
2013-02-27 13:59 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-02-27 22:24 ` JonY
2013-02-28 0:28 ` marco atzeri
2013-02-28 10:05 ` Yaakov
2013-02-28 17:06 ` NightStrike
2013-02-28 19:44 ` Yaakov
2013-03-06 10:29 ` Yaakov
2013-03-06 10:41 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-03-06 16:14 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130221165907.GG28458@calimero.vinschen.de \
--to=corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).