From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28159 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2013 19:26:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 28142 invoked by uid 89); 23 Oct 2013 19:26:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.72) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:26:12 +0000 Received: from pool-98-110-183-69.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.183.69] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ44I-000FBC-Nb for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:26:10 +0000 Received: from cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0600F60103 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+lksEOApMPWXAqg9ZdPzhv Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:26:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Testing ping for cygwin x86_64 Message-ID: <20131023192609.GA4734@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20131017185430.GB23477@calimero.vinschen.de> <20131023075856.GA4712@calimero.vinschen.de> <20131023174205.GA1619@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <87ppqvq1ch.fsf@Rainer.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ppqvq1ch.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >>>Noarch packages are fine, but the packaging mechanism doesn't support >>>them the same way as in Linux distros. They still have to show up >>>twice, once in the 32 and once in the 64 bit release area. >> >> i.e., just like Linux distros do. > >Not all or even most of them. The repo layout usually is like this: > >dist/ > noarch/ > i386/ > i586/ > i686/ > x86_64/ > >Setup.exe can deal just fine with such a layout when there are ../noarch >paths in setup.ini. http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os/Packages/e/ Notice the "noarch" intermingled with x86_64. cgf