From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5338 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2014 18:28:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 5316 invoked by uid 89); 19 Mar 2014 18:28:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:28:11 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id C7DAE8E0A15; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:28:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:28:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygport cross compilation Message-ID: <20140319182808.GA22726@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <5329C6AE.7080803@cornell.edu> <5329DC45.7070806@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5329DC45.7070806@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 938 On Mar 19 13:04, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2014-03-19 11:32, Ken Brown wrote: > >I've just started experimenting with using cygport for cross compiling, > >and I've come across two issues: > > > >1. This is just a request: The latest cygport for Fedora appends i686 or > >x86_64 to the name of the working directory. I would find it convenient > >if cygport did the same thing on Cygwin, at least if the --32 or --64 > >option is specified. >=20 > Actually, that is experimental code (based on a request from another > cygport user) that was accidentally shipped when I had to reroll the > source tarball for compatibility with F20/UnversionedDocDirs. Would > people like to see this done always, never, or only when > cross-building? Always wouldn't hurt, I think. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTKeG4AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gDcIP/A0N1Qwa7KnZBehj4cxrNsLs QEmGjHsaH+u06xDe85SuKggN6X0JnXOyS/C5bYIkPgWn5r54JCiSh5y4WU3m1wcq xfhxCPKx2it2Q66L5uwmBpPqcO/pwLVbZ/oX/2wzNgBmmKSUBKWNjsMA92HvQ7Xu T42CMad6uL7tb7IPsN1BSb549ACSdMBDkuwmpdQ73+tFfjDtXLcl+nX95rhPFkvD /YUWQK79qfkCCwt+shcLI3IUtqbs8sTsu0/6kpu2rzW2gRxxe3JrYr+Myr9hN2iq Yb/PA22PRK4A42VlXGaBYSL0Yizr4AtcVT9XWPEFLtHMrPKml/y7zOyCJDXhD5YJ DBnHPcIHZUKSV5HdgX2V3QTgrUnGvzSTPBRclmWYdv2nmyHcrX/CTAUPHaCNUP7t 4pjQdpOAJGV2WirtoBpWum/n1BPKLsX2/1xq15e4+TeYWcL5on87zpkTGkbQF/C+ t/tJz/UgzvTIroDBHgu0cQPj+9aqaHJ2qLem+lZwxGmOYhEqVExUjXt/vhn2v2GS R/N4DhfpN41nc5tTNkIMjWljJGtlQRzgj0x41Fyozyzv/+fF2sZ14YjchbhAIyVG iT9mGXDDuYbhEAV8NJWk76t6jOqUxMQcURjgSj/Idt61tmsjMWpYQ0Hh+1E+M3x5 bLlx/H/R1HUbCDam/YXw =SoEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--