Re: perl-5.14.4

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2598 bytes --]

On Feb  4 21:41, Achim Gratz wrote:
> As I said in another thread I intend to skip directly to version 5.22
> shortly after it becomes available in May (assuming the release schedule
> is still holds).
> 
> While looking into some of the test fails on 5.18.4 I've moved back to
> 5.14.4 for comparison (the fail turned out to be a combination of new
> optimizations in gcc-4.9 and undefined behaviour in Perl code).  The fix
> in this case was to add a compiler flag (-fwrapv) that disables those
> optimizations and I'm now back to having roughly the same test fails as
> the old 5.14.2 from Reini:
> 
> Failed 9 tests out of 2048, 99.56% okay.
>         ../cpan/Win32/t/GetShortPathName.t
>   --> returns a long path name when called from mintty
>         ../cpan/Win32/t/Names.t
>   --> this old version of Win32 does not know about Windows 8.1
>         ../cpan/Win32/t/Unicode.t
>   --> ANSI path functions do not return the expected results
>         ../dist/Net-Ping/t/510_ping_udp.t
>   --> same as 5.14.2
>         ../ext/XS-APItest/t/call_checker.t
>   --> same as 5.14.2
>         ../lib/File/stat.t
>   --> works if test is not run as Administrator (but then other tests fail)
>         op/filetest.t
>   --> works if test is not run as Administrator (but then other tests fail)
>         porting/exec-bit.t
>   --> global.sym has exec bit set, but not registered as such
>         porting/regen.t
>   --> also something to do with global.sym
> 
> I'll probably keep the Win32 and other bundled CPAN modules as released
> with 5.14 and provide the latest versions as unbundled perl-* packages
> so that Module::CoreList doesn't lie to the user.
> 
> So, it looks like I'm ready to bring Perl on both 32bit and 64bit to the
> same (final 5.14.4) version plus I can already do the packaging changes
> planned for the 5.22 release (dissolution of perl_vendor and creation of
> perl_base as a minimal install variant) for both architectures.  I hope
> that this would enable a much smoother transition when that version gets
> released since the dependencies of those packages relying on Perl should
> be fixable until then.
> 
> If this sounds like a good idea to everybody else I'd remove the current
> test package for 5.18.4 on 32bit and replace it with another test
> package for 5.14.4, likely in about two weeks.  Comments or suggestions?

Sounds perfect to me.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]