Re: perl-5.14.4

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1633 bytes --]

On Mar  5 14:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 16 16:42, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > Uh oh, the debug information is either broken (which is unlikely) or GDB
> > > doesn't use it anymore due to the CRC mismatch.  Maybe the same CRC
> > > mismatch breaks objcopy in cygport, given that both are based on the
> > > same BFD code?
> > 
> > Maybe, but none of the tools ever complained about the CRC (I remember
> > that GDB checks it though).  A CRC should be a fixable thing, though.
> > 
> > > For the time being, is it really required to rebase the DLLs for testing
> > > before the debug information is split off?  If you could do the rebase
> > > and test cycle after splitting off the debug info, the problem should be
> > > neglectable.
> > 
> > For the moment I've changed the patch to EUMM to check if it's run from
> > cygport and not rebase the just produced DLL in that case.  I only need
> > to remember to package the module before testing instead of the other
> > way around (and do a manual rebase before testing, but that isn't
> > difficult).  So, I have a workaround.
> 
> FYI: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
> 
> So the binutils problem is fixed upstream, we're just waiting for GDB
> to catch up.  Another collegue of mine will have a look as soon as time
> permits.

Here's one for testing, Achim:

https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-03/msg00020.html


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]