From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63542 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2015 21:06:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 63525 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jun 2015 21:06:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:06:19 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 463CAA805AC; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:06:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: setup Message-ID: <20150601210617.GW4308@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87382fdvjp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20150531102421.GB4329@calimero.vinschen.de> <878uc3l2my.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20150601183432.GT4308@calimero.vinschen.de> <874mmrky4e.fsf@Rainer.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LJm8egi4vkexsie5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874mmrky4e.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 --LJm8egi4vkexsie5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1279 On Jun 1 21:49, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> Since it seems you plan to use libcrypto from OpenSSL anyway: > >> https://gist.github.com/barrysteyn/7308212#file-base64decode-c > > > > I don't. Why do you think so? >=20 > Because of the openssl branch in Git. Oh, that was a bad idea. I won't remove the branch for historical reasons, but we don't really want to link agaionst OpenSSL when we already link against gcrypt. > > This was a drop-in replacement for Digest::MD5. Anything else I'll > > let somebody do who better knows perl. >=20 > THen the call $ctx->hexdigest() would need to be replaced by > $ctx->b64digest(). No, it would need to support this additionally. > > Apart from this, the sah512.sum files are not only generated for the > > Cygwin release dir, they are generated on the sourceware ftp area > > system-wide. >=20 > I'm only talking about SHA512 in the setup.ini files, though. The > sha512.sum files have no bearing on that. So what exactly is the problem with the longer checksums? I don't see any problem here, especially when the file is being compressed anyway. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --LJm8egi4vkexsie5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVbMlJAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gw+4QAJbz2GBE0Kr+KvXjvTiv/GQa Il2j7y3cC6FyUtChWo8HBVALPAxmqpXVsnyUcZXujPD2J/jomSQRztAUfltyyVgK Puof1Wn+jatLiWSg1Ps8w6YLpSgM0edE4bJdGrmcxf0Q9ZUSbrbRhTbnUd4hpDOk pDGJOWw8z4vjyQ7JUvfCglKhwZE2hf9ZOF+o3MMyq+Mdctp6/iTRgVechDziAH3K cmcnjU8diAzh/tllJOdNSY7VEPbsfT5jST+GclvzDYdoKD3ETWXYfOpKUvWina18 EVdBItSfORvtsyLM1+Kc/EGhZ5vM7yscF0YL4AYsXXPp+x93XmvbX/6ISPIOX1KH dchmEeJBJfx7ZXrHaZnBtLpNYkjEmveuxs9bjvAtKi8xXj4jhZJBvVUr8IhNrVs6 9m/OJYj2s1lw3tLEIHmRw7LHvj5m9Lh2r+LviaEL68oQ0nZ6iSGRmPhuh4Q5mTeK lghOKCBdFSXBCqD55C2r2vZ/FaVQHXEpIV/lpdYbCc2B06fJ+Ln/CNJuVp20vlmF O6U9K2xzDuYjLg90kuFUo09XN8amQHUINgH0Qpwm9IZP/OSJsm5EWRnkU1hGWYKD h7JAqyKrbbSrSR2G7dNSLVExhvSCF0mr570IxoKyoKC57NzqIOkZAccWhJBPr+4B YlUqXKY0s+Hx+UGn4Vau =xGqo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LJm8egi4vkexsie5--