From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12399 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2015 11:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 12387 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2015 11:05:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (HELO emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi) (62.142.5.109) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:05:09 +0000 Received: from picasso.cante.net (91-157-45-228.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.157.45.228]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901E7188845 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:05:06 +0300 (EEST) Received: from jaalto by picasso.cante.net with local (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGmP4-00047R-3x; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:05:06 +0300 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:05:00 -0000 From: jari To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: missing 64bit ports (xdelta3 vs xdelta and pristine-tar) Message-ID: <20150719110506.GN26914@picasso.cante.net> References: <20150716080656.GF26914@picasso.cante.net> <55A766E0.2030706@gmail.com> <20150716081713.GG26914@picasso.cante.net> <87h9p43q8t.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20150716235202.GI26914@picasso.cante.net> <55A89361.3000802@gmail.com> <20150717072234.GJ26914@picasso.cante.net> <87wpxyfy33.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20150718081109.GK26914@picasso.cante.net> <55AAACF9.8010801@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55AAACF9.8010801@gmail.com> X-Gpg-Key-Id: 0xD189E680 X-Gpg-Key-Info: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xD189E680 X-Gpg-Key-Get: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD189E680&op=get User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jari.aalto@cante.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on picasso.cante.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On 2015-07-18 21:46, Marco Atzeri wrote: | | | On 7/18/2015 10:11 AM, jari wrote: | >On 2015-07-17 20:17, Achim Gratz wrote: | >| jari writes: | >| > All good, provided that: | >| > | >| > xdelta1 => /usr/bin/xdelta (the original) | >| > xdelta3 => /usr/bin/xdelta3 | >| | >| Why? The most current version of pristine-tar from git includes a commit | >| that gets rid of the hardcoded command names. | > | >Could you point me to it. Joey's attic Git? | > | >| Given that it's pristine-tar that holds onto an earlier version of | >| xdelta, I don't see why other users of xdelta expecting to get the | >| latest version should be suffering from that. | > | >The official setup in Debian: | > | > xdelta: /usr/bin/xdelta (version 1.1.3) | > xdelta3: /usr/bin/xdelta3 | > | >I think we should ensure compatibility between operating systems by | >having similar setup. | > | >Jari | > | | as today | $ cygcheck -cd |grep xdelta | xdelta 3.0.9-1 | | To avoid backwards, my proposal is | | xdelta1-1.1.4-2 | xdelta-3.0.9-2 (removing the xdelta link to xdelta3) | | if we agree that going backward in not a problem, | | xdelta-1.1.4-2 | xdelta3-3.0.9-2 The latter. It would be in par with Linux packages. Jari