On Jul 20 22:09, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Why?  Version 1.10 is obviously < 1.100 or 1.1000.  How's this handled
> > in rpm?
> 
> Dunno about rpm.  But for Perl, version numbers are handled a bit
> differently and that extends to the versioning of distributions.  Your
> above example is valid for "numified" version numbers, but not other
> variants.

How do you tell upset that a package uses a different numbering
scheme?  You'd have two scenarios which can't be recognized 
automatically, don't you?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat