From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70148 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2015 15:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 69663 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2015 15:11:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:11:35 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id EAF31A807DA; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:11:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:11:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: missing 64bit ports Message-ID: <20150907151132.GA28672@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <55A66D0B.7030603@gmail.com> <55AD3B1B.3050209@dronecode.org.uk> <55AF5D7C.7060707@gmail.com> <55E85158.5060109@gmail.com> <20150903154501.GU23669@calimero.vinschen.de> <55E9A323.4030404@dronecode.org.uk> <20150904140318.GB6190@calimero.vinschen.de> <55ED98A5.6020404@dronecode.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55ED98A5.6020404@dronecode.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 667 On Sep 7 15:01, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 04/09/2015 15:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Sep 4 14:56, Jon TURNEY wrote: > >>xwinwm: I think this can be classed as a 'failed experiment' > > > >What does that mean in terms of the cygwin-pkg-list? >=20 > I guess it means that we won't make a 64 bit package. >=20 > Making xwinwm obsolete doesn't make much sense until the support for it in > xserver is removed, which I plan to do eventually. But we could remove it from cygwin-64bit-missing, isn't it, Yaakov? Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV7akkAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gyNcQAKBPR64AlAMq2tgd8n7Y6PtQ ObWJrXGJLYOpv4K31ZBIVw4wAeK1iJY6GgnnnGtxHaxw1XWaWMy3S9M/jGJA9U0/ NhI7i6TfXDUN8x9TGoOJxvdpK7gnDU7dSBFlGb2e6n71BvhSIRRtZ6aWdu6EVsS6 vOW9WFax5AHjLOdVcnAge/YYomnpkypbVdKuVPOyaY4goN2ndSjxVE43TihA4NIp SXhBcePe0UjGzI0XaHfb1YnygiN0CU2mLOFpEGgpSFuAn5hv8y69KEBcYiNsfy5P kgM6WrMbQMMDVh+rtdUGlsNwaFlVuTw5I5D8S6W3307U1tEhVc0YsJuXHE5zYYWV jh7fo6qM/o2vK20aBlxb/159zJBMdwOHpx3mUWApJEpARLONZTOEgAY84cTwhXEd 3WVfM6WccSYgxpHXXk/8fVbp05R/kh5xtHBf/kz9XFr6gyJbeK+jzVMPvAW8KCu+ PlwfqlyXNGxsLbg3B92k3CreYSgAN6aTG0OqgacooDMEylgkJQ3zy58Owy+HKCCS EYF8Mp4E1cirsg9mjAfb2lVKnZUOyHuxhq/9fwv+4ZKPVN3lKqctadXwSL91PFPm kWYn/N27YwR2CYWXMbfzk2Cgd5bAcEBIFlmKBwzijpq0Uw/5fcOA/QtoaaY2ePw7 bGGQqsu4uyKKim5BtU1M =W8Js -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--