From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92993 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2016 15:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 92597 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2016 15:18:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=historical, misc, H*R:D*cygwin.com X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0d020.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.208.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:18:21 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9D682A8039E; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:18:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:18:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.8 Message-ID: <20160320151819.GA337@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <56EC6BDA.7050505@cornell.edu> <20160318214509.GD11113@calimero.vinschen.de> <56EC8053.40604@cornell.edu> <56EC89C2.9010105@cygwin.com> <56EC8F50.9020905@cygwin.com> <56ECB842.7090807@cornell.edu> <20160319103209.GE11113@calimero.vinschen.de> <56EE2BF7.7000307@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56EE2BF7.7000307@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 796 On Mar 19 23:49, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-03-19 05:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Glibc uses __USE_MISC to guard the inclusion of sys/select.h, newlib's > >header uses __BSD_VISIBLE which is almost the same. But we have the > >equivalent __MISC_VISIBLE as well. Do you want to change that, Yaakov? >=20 > If you want, but with the implementation of _DEFAULT_SOURCE (since glibc > 2.20), there is no functional difference between BSD, SVID, and MISC; it's > mostly historical and documentative at this point. It might be helpful to align this with glibc, even if it's just to keep the people from puzzeling over the difference. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW7r87AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gBZ0P/i0LCGgrlMl0CxMYMbSzwLqx I5G/92zCRF5Rhqd44D0XUF59j6lfKHkYbHTR0L/XnRTsLjggQld4GRpBlv/sD345 1XigWcXKYfl+jvZxPbasJWn5XZfL1XKurZNiAwzSM77fFyQ7NOM2qQ62OuFTwW+t 9ZGZhCUFtw+luXMscYmicCj0xVMJElqBxyX0j3sD4La79D4pohSczym7OQCSuuoc sbCXAUJoisAN2DA7W57IMeaFEs62UDUNJDv4jdYx660ImWSGaExXxgTLqU0zmuKg WzmSmm3NaogM/RNUUKSrPBw1DNGbT3e9pe3evx6unbq90C9SUo0XQyJvn2zma+Qz RqbHrVwkE4vntLZfbuW3XOM9LA+eOIKPqSdZEuKgt0FTWyliZXHZirLaFlRuiBdo IaTyVBWeVfQ7t0fNBNYGmLSKJU76IgxhC8kZWmMrrGx7BAT8W/erysydpQL076/O jB2Y4Ozg7K9Wo/suOMsCz8MH0AWkaNAqTgk5TzEgQrFSebRr6e+qQQgVRIto4p/R 4Fjnrg9eEYh+0uJ2O1lrtHFHMhQ7t6PI4MtCcof2uNCD6zI1KHxDeyRFvKsObtnQ oO4ytVeQbYGJbE4765GAyeq2uPKrDmOZsebuIzwm1CNdQm4NOXKEBTgKMtRUiiV9 o2qRSr/DiqHktZ2QLLpj =0dk/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--