From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15831 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 16:05:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 15790 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 16:05:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Recently, orphaned, who's, whos X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc04766.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.71.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:05:36 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 830E8A803E7; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:05:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:05:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Building from source packages Message-ID: <20160518160534.GD361@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1164 On May 13 15:33, Jon Turney wrote: >=20 > Recently I've done a little prototyping of a system to build from uploaded > source packages in a VM, to verify that they recreate packages with the s= ame > contents as the uploaded packages. >=20 > Issues I noted were: > [...] > * a handful of packages are oddities >=20 > These often contain source and patches, but no build script, so the > configuration used by the maintainer to build the package isn't recorded = (at > least in a way accessible to automation) >=20 > pkg ver arch > --- --- ---- > bzr 2.6+b2-2 x86 contains source for 2.6b2-1 and 2.6+b2-2 > exim 4.86-1 both > fetchmail 6.3.21-1 x86 > flex 2.5.39-1 both orphaned > ipc-utils 1.0-1 x86 The orignal x86 package predates me using cygport. The x86_64 package has then probably been built by Yaakov, who's much less a slacker than I am. Just rebuilding the 32 bit packafge with Yaakov's 64 bit cygport file will probably do. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXPJLOAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+grpEQAIumLEeeLHHABJmlZGwTufY7 cWCPh32w+dMlUYEtjQHUrhqRS0cFR/gDeFK3oup+DrGDWITG7lzdXr4w+lJRO0s6 3mbw++kUYx9CjsQZvn+fK9wyQ00Hb4UDz2u9uYQU51OwcJFI046yJ4s+lVYd2WyO +sH6Zx+UUkl/J7so65tDoXgoK0EVJn+f2K2oofW/xiUOp03D/UdXVik+AZhUVl3J NOYsX72EjKnD5oLdsFCsBaxuD2buRwucVX+P82fLkwjiABQwKGh0XeaB01owdEHg MLmtE/OGqs808E7Zb/KISAyr6vExkZ3xN5dknNAByeegA0hQFLeiQPffDbFfL+T3 hSSPzbgp2Ph+HWpGVXdfFhoHBvsJM1dja3m8MAoQEOb6vZWprsKXEJnWA7rnUxGj eB7SQhoqC9ImLE5h6vyN80w84ZnyGjSPcsMx27lmhUvgFxp3G4xJhNI+cwwpOX4p QftEEa0Eq55GNpGYhtI/OCSro+zDWv8woi9sYd1X6jSrJkWhoTOQ6/W7zLQS/ObD 5LNhF3Togiht8oc4ONPuaEvsuonRqQrl6ZwbeO56FBz3AqrPiEa2iZC9Ud8CBGOD vucfdowgphGPpLXnSgVMLw+4SXHigrPSb1edJ6TlNYqOIt7WbgihANLFQwbh3vOr QchzrSJZUk8rdP65rtd6 =3RBP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--