From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95556 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2016 08:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 95416 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jun 2016 08:50:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-96.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=stacey, Stacey, government, u.s X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0227e.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.34.126) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:50:00 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 85810A8063D; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:49:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:50:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin? Message-ID: <20160606084958.GE14744@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1009 On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote: > I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to > maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if > someone could check the licence [1]. >=20 > It's a fairly standard 3-clause BSD affair, but with the caveat that 'the > U.S. Government retains certain rights in this software.' It isn't clear = (to > me, at least) what rights are being referred to. Would such a clause > prohibit its inclusion in Cygwin? >=20 > Note that gcovr isn't available for Fedora or CentOS, although this could= be > because it hasn't been packaged for these distros, rather than any > incompatibility in the licence. It is, however, available for Debian and > Ubuntu [2]. >=20 > Any thoughts on its suitability for Cygwin? Let me ask somebody who knows this better than me... Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXVTk2AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+g7sgP/iiiZ6JjnvdJzBXv8+hWnTGH LmbgY9sr57FhPA5UtDf0og0y9wppBi1UriBC6BFWL1ZiZF8+P0s+uM0jGqafLT3t /xLetXCZBM228vIgJdkpa3gRFUMrx/TuqbvuycT8VTsyb+mzRIbQa9+uBCBsYjSn KlqEmmMNjno2IofBPc5SOpBgPnBZf8fW3Sr2VOhyO2hfezwz21L+VNkeqjFSrFXu Zy1XA4xO1UvmzpCR1P+3MVkpRz0KUJBVJ1Cl3paHYCvQMjYz0gKQd6sN1GQFcJ7/ +ydK70CvlxK/yTmUQigCKhbAZNVrmzpcmJ+Os0UtPEls4pzlEga6AOe1sG0cXgNp TJNlbEtixb66BLmgxsPa8yAQ2OrOqYw5ICV+eE5+MRjlpRo4C8PP6YPMp1IHJYWN SiDcLJepTK79/PHCniODz/dyb9f+33dNQ6hYmIfH325LKQA/2pvfEUf7vFOgCCy1 tWALfST7KUT0kp1g4idtKolHm8DKZYTjUzAbyFYL9JSDc/JtBdQsFl8TQCitrhFu fXLp4H0p1LnhC830F3KqgFi2bvA6Hm4nMkK/ONnBdI/I8HQV24WO+czioe9V/BRC h6ag5bduO3jx0zQY6creW1FygtkaEdEhCxBl6vkzcPfJaZH6hfEqWcxAtQR3c2IV fOPZ3MZ1CfRqJcIOlegA =m8gL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC--