From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93377 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2016 09:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 93328 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2016 09:41:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-94.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=no X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0190b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.25.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:41:04 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 28D5DA805C0; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:41:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:41:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8 Message-ID: <20160719094102.GP7018@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20160718081931.GE7018@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1713 On Jul 18 19:51, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 7/18/16, 12:43 PM, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: >=20 >=20 > >On 7/18/16, 1:19 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >>Btw., I didn't apply it yet because I was still waiting for a mailing > >>list reply to https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-06/msg00460.html > >>On second thought, this didn't look like a question, much. So, what do > >>you prefer? > >> > >> "WinFSP+nobody" > >> "nodomain+nobody" > >> "no+body" > >> > >>Personally I like the third variation but I'm not religious about it. > > > >My preference is for nodomain+nobody, primarily because the individual > >components =E2=80=9Cnodomain=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Cnobody=E2=80=9D describe= the lack of domain and username > >when read in isolation (i.e. not in the construction nodomain+nobody). B= ut > >WinFsp does not use these names (only the SID=E2=80=99s/UID=E2=80=99s) a= nd you, Corinna, > >as the Cygwin lead are more qualified than me to choose what fits Cygwin > >best. >=20 > BTW, I now note that no+body is more inline with the existing practice of > "Unknown+User=E2=80=9D. I assumed that the parts of the =E2=80=9Cno+body= =E2=80=9D construction can > be found in isolation (resulting in a domain of =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D and = a user name of > =E2=80=9Cbody=E2=80=9D), but perhaps this is not possible. Either way I a= m happy with > whatever you choose. Let's just try how it looks like. I applied the patch using "nodomain+nobody" for now and uploaded a developer snapshot to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please take a look. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXjfWtAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gpUEP/i/NtIC+nPZc6GeMLCgL4d5W 3dcI9yVjXgl9BgscxBKiuhA/v15cMqWDd6SFJAelHne2aq7QPpWCRtCd89i0UFTS jeJebl0xtynysvZT7okCA1cCZ3zGFwQT/lkqd7Dxs/VSDP82Kb5hRBJGEHcu0zpZ 6GnF6bAI3RGTQE9SKRUZT4M+dSUxU164HRvK1/lhyaHpuAax+FQRbXljJ/Ccgwm6 SdLjk4NS239rxwLD32CNc/85w6qMMc50qsXVhrsbOq/DT5Mc7zRJjZ8IifSYOEXY VQy11NvRWmQJO7guqoMYpbMZIr/5ziWdhmxJsjZtnA4pazxeIX3KWs39RoCg6l3U DrwP25hYeDAlnQnUZ43OBalUrLhij3jCgA4ZYRtKFMgOUYNGHWVz7ZiOrNivRPZK KHY3Aeu90v/R74glPf3Ps04VbACA4sC3XcgPNoWi27ZT8on/SX2Hs4ZZgBKJfUPP zZAkvU9ZZ/Qgdjl6IRTW+sYBeBLFXeRvMctZtBdpIyzeAgVc7UGQEcPhctKCjQ3N seeGztCucntqHepaqPJMSWWBnpDr+oNhmOl/wMd27PePb12zkrMMGHkVlSnvmSXU P76/ZRii/91OUzxW7qJ8SNANC0IyWbqcSa7627DMnxZ+XAhrEIz9dYsHEi1QHC5V GwclmEnra9qhnrR4S/LZ =3who -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --doKZ0ri6bHmN2Q5y--