From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47597 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2016 07:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 47585 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2016 07:59:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-94.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Zissimopoulos, zissimopoulos, DOT, H*R:D*cygwin.com X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0190b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.25.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:59:28 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8EEEFA805FA; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:59:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:59:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8 Message-ID: <20160722075926.GF7018@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20160718081931.GE7018@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160719094102.GP7018@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160720085223.GV7018@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tv3+oRj6D9L8lW+H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 --Tv3+oRj6D9L8lW+H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 969 On Jul 21 22:11, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 7/20/16, 1:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >=20 > >We just might still want to change the name to "no+body". > > > >What do others on this list think? What sounds better? > > > > "nodomain+nobody" or "no+body" >=20 > Corinna, hi. >=20 > I know you have asked others to chime in, but IMO you should go ahead and > change it to =E2=80=9Cno+body=E2=80=9D. Done. > I also would ask others to chime in regarding this package and > specifically if it is one they would like to see in Cygwin. >=20 > I am also unclear on what the next steps are regarding this package > submission. Does the package need 5 votes in order to be accepted? Does it > only need 1 GTG vote because FUSE packages already exist on most major > Linux distros? A GTG should be ok here. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --Tv3+oRj6D9L8lW+H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXkdJeAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+ggBQP/3LbKkd8ubJHwgIqmTLEMmM2 51rT0n+NjqyZyLIDs65AYEhITqQp6MLWz8LClVHqP6ECF0Z38V+yMq9VBf+lByb7 YjY0BWAdJQfZjjAcShevDF+wBAheUG7tVX10fBAcsk0Zq0etcB7svLnIANAfKCEM iFTrdWStN1/iBfcgCJy5z0jNLzJeXsjYdRCRnLZVB52X/QJdju1yPnOAiK0cKP17 hW2YNEQMVfYs3KOnGSnGNc3G45q8s0wU1E3f6A2ODBnLUINYtUCWM/4HVtqXAcwW peNKEpleMKxdtRXCKit0Cs6mZ4pcyLfit84ad8KOcINOzzO1SGxvKCtlAhMPpNCj lyDbSq04WxRXhhfFsuQVgDjCtp0Vl3+BcfR2l8O96yEQjZLq9xCMu7oV0hkFJbsb smLhosOBwMCgW9nhbvd0tPr7OLZBF72a5SRtzU6wgqGpGJcdCktmghvYkXC7ACgH zxMIMiYRxuKYzEJf9KM1zEjIpkjti0kbSerd/pxDQLFwLxuiqFLxL7xOvkE6iEep BWleS1iz/Cdv6SbX7EUsJvlXdCp1dx8P/CsWNz71kuvhQaj70XSEHyDTj7g377Q7 YWx3M8feqc9iY/LPL37ndrM9hH+LP0c4HNpP2Q4RqZwvoZ3luDrjIMJ3NsuZgliw UfvHmA1wN5NLBQa9ijMd =aMv0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Tv3+oRj6D9L8lW+H--