From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14668 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2016 07:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 14652 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2016 07:35:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-94.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:2566, price, pay X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0190b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.25.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:35:40 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4A6CFA806D5; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:35:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8 Message-ID: <20160725073538.GF11373@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20160723104021.GA18159@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160723174836.GD11373@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CblX+4bnyfN0pR09" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 2631 On Jul 23 18:33, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote: > On 7/23/16, 10:48 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >=20 >=20 > >So you quoted my knee-jerk reaction but missed to quote the *real* point > >of my mail. Fixed that for you: > > > >> > Here's an idea: You both slap yourself and start talking to each > >>other. > >> >=20 > >> > For the Windows *and* Cygwin world it would be *much* preferrable if > >>you > >> > work together and create a single, unified FUSE concept, rather than > >> > having two projects doing almost, but not entirely, the same thing, > >> > Worse, given that FUSE only makes sense if user-space filesystems > >>exist, > >> > we now have two FUSE concepts with a disjunct set of user-space > >>drivers. > > > >> I was planning to work for a solution for how to have multiple *-fuse > >> packages coexist based on Marco=E2=80=99s great answer. > > > >Which is not the answer I'd expected since it completely ignores the > >part about "talking to each other", "single FUSE concept" and > >"collaboration". >=20 > Corinna, I apologize to you and the list for not being on my best > behavior. However=E2=80=A6 >=20 > I *have* contributed to Dokany. Despite the fact that my own project is > independent and not a Dokan fork (and has a completely different This is one detail I missed here. If this has been mentioned earlier I apologise for not noticing it. I was under the implression WinFsp and dokany are from the same source code base, > design/architecture), a couple of days ago I suggested on their mailing > list that I would still work with them. The events of the last couple of > days changed my mind. >=20 > I work on my project(s) because I can and because I find that it is fun, > even when I am debugging for 2 days why the LazyWriter hangs in some > obscure kernel corner. If it gets too political it stops being fun. If I > am forced to work on something I would rather not, it stops being fun too. >=20 > I want to contribute to Cygwin, because I have been a user since the early > 2000=E2=80=99s and because I cannot live on Windows without it. I thought= I had > something to contribute after all this time. Unfortunately it looks like > the price of admission may be higher than I am willing to pay at this tim= e. As I said, I'm not going to refuse your package. I was just pissed about this discussion in conjunction with my (now) obvious misunderstanding that we're talking about two forks of the same code. Please go ahead as planned, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXlcFKAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gbE4QAIVL5X6w1rafT7U2UMCOUkb6 mZA5dQlRN/T9P+l3+tZtSOZi37WOJtNpVDwdfvPWFKmv8lWKknlZbDhydf2a7kwD Pi865JWZfNG6wDoFHPDW9P2h2n5pFUWYr2kx58fplUJhUSJTFGRoh9HxdX7qr+2S sUd4/iZtVhvpLDHn6vxWGZwpo7ft1RcWfr2/BnQcN5yfvX5Krw0dYb1VwIV3F0ib TbHGnI//Vob97I7RruDoiM695XqoE2SUF2VlBL8qZDXxWrUTsuN1rKpAWIFNTn4e ZRkRISZCMgH92sTl5XjTRlVoUn5DMFkKwb6STBMV6EmJR17g52hFodu3LSGQvui8 NoBRvrkQp7HE1VqefQL6e5MJPk9emTadV8KJCGfTpb/DT3fQaPpIbAaJVQbZ2k6a k2vzyuoUQr6WdHm3tuFyU++JGGUSAF1RmLMwNQQ3dkR1pdOMiMy1ktGojgXZ1zI2 okgV5CJxzxWzIq+j/eXBwKk5CBSldr3Bpb/+s/wxUTzZElZcalYoWKy0/QX3ZOeG AGsLUcxEpDw8Us4WREtvdKu43Su+HdlwNOux4wJu8nJtaoHnO7beFKjV48fo5bq3 zeUsoKVJ8S+5XMP1tldIXZBGUnJpBYYvZNAgntgVsmHjTU7Ay9zZVjS3ehhTnYYr QQCoJqc+Sa/HjZ6wv2pr =XRj8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09--