On Jul 17 01:06, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:02 -0400
> cyg Simple wrote:
> > On 7/16/2018 5:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > As a compromise, we could continue to provide the client package and
> > > just discontinue the server package, but it's your choice.
> > 
> > What use would there be even for the client?  Even in my home mode
> > connecting to BlueHost or any other such service I need ssh to connect
> > to my server.
> 
> The existence of the rsh package itself does not pose a vulnerability
> to cygwin. People who do not need rsh package do not have to install it.
> 
> Should not it leaves on users to decide whether to install or not?
> I think that it is better for users to have a choice.

I agree.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat