From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E553896802 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:22:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 66E553896802 Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id c12so11778679pfo.10 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:22:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTMQ8hu89QUrynzAWn2K/4Epv8MItLTMmbf0GZ6a278=; b=tUSfS3EAIBKX0Wd6ycXsSgD4aJDyK38ISKQo33vgusywGN7Scgn1kj2E+ThQS0+Pxj 3vr2HTPt7ixNokvEUrdU5kcEjHXNKlaAasiUNZsM0Pfppdt6auwswvm4fEjqDsg0KM+A VA/3fXNa/Dn0OtUPZF09ocJlYW0oFu+ioSwIAc5J30Dr338/z22kCf3THLuc3YuvSBmN /+VOaPYsQNm7Vvo91/FSDurFDAIokoV5BnHkvjz+eyIF6jJxJmiqDU+fz62memMxIuL8 yGDHEejG0YUbi/qaKlWbfDF5rtEdybpFfRM+ITKjpJIFh/SN7Y7nBIemuLtulCQe8eFf l6Uw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SfDPuUHhRjsq8XcdUxSbZYtb4y/cFLDZtcIek3HsxsbZJM3+W 1l9R3sv3aQHEP3a1rqVXQOqQrR0Iiv0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwy2zdWoo+2qlZyOPi69mE2bMtpJ0D14NPf7rJDXTAfdJR9ljl8XUKH1yZcDr6KHJJkRY2jNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b4a:: with SMTP id a10mr21868745pgl.112.1609453362306; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:22:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.11] ([2400:2411:aa20:4300:8d7d:ba68:bbb:5cc6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm12150698pjm.21.2020.12.31.14.22.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:22:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 07:22:41 +0900 From: Lemures Lemniscati To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITA] libexif-0.6.22-1 In-Reply-To: References: <20201231195443.4EBD.50F79699@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20210101072238.C18E.50F79699@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.75.02 [ja] X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 201231-6, 2021/01/01), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:22:44 -0000 On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:44:20 +0100, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps > On 31.12.2020 11:54, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > Helped by Achim Gratz, now I can tell ITA for libexif-0.6.22-1 again, > > and, in a following mail, ITA for exif-0.6.22-1. > > > > -- > > ITA for libexif, which has been maintained by Yaakov [1]. > > > > Now, the latest upstream of libexif is 0.6.22 [2]. > > > > A new candidate cygport file is placed at [3]. > > And, it's been tested on Cygwin AppVeyor CI (ID 1557: [4]). > > > > Generated package files are placed at [5] and [6]: > > > > * libexif-common-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > > * libexif-devel-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > > * libexif12-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > > > > * libexif-0.6.22-1-src.tar.xz > > * libexif-debuginfo-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > > it builds fine and pass the tests > > I would remove the pull for the shared lib > > printf -v "libexif${ABI}_REQUIRES" "%s" "libexif-common" > > of the general doc > > >>> libexif-common-0.6.22-1.tar.xz > usr/share/doc/ > usr/share/doc/libexif/ > usr/share/doc/libexif/ABOUT-NLS > usr/share/doc/libexif/AUTHORS > usr/share/doc/libexif/ChangeLog > usr/share/doc/libexif/COPYING > usr/share/doc/libexif/NEWS > usr/share/doc/libexif/README > usr/share/doc/libexif/SECURITY.md > > but it is just my opinion > Thank you, Marco. I agree. And I'll remove the dependency and rebuild. Regards, Lem