From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A4A385800F for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 02:46:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 50A4A385800F Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id b5so8324493pjl.0 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:46:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCXNrSFimdvHrk+WM2EZ6vIc7RLUfiPu9oItheRNj5g=; b=X13Ew1lPJ+muLDAApVHRK6qiPsZ1PMCw/ehV0G7Yps9Cn4F5aQT2Xj5h/mxTwI2Vx5 nOxUEokB8F6Ef2wGHjUJxdIQeLlRs7Puv/Vwp4tNttL43wKVWksP7JOc6vyPczkh5H8R GBC59zoFHAAt9gzGANC2c+4Q0lc8Z4nTBd3veg5CySQX634ReBMXs9LepWUa8+BaXIOf ky+T6kVDH7T87gVcoqt7ZEXwX5yLFypwcbEiSb5eYeqBubjxbbB+Wp1E250Fk0I+cMGY 8CvAk+jdLUgxKYk8N4B9gC/dbt1F4fl1tYjDGapmqq+7PMYUIuHzZfYd7R2mcQLJSGFJ qvtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MOwgmM6wKsWwa6ruM2F4WVeDiSsYfbEsXuI05El7eBreIu6HR GPYL/sHgfCPUq7UK2IrVq5L2wGn0eaI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysGosXHer1VCBvHa1d5Z1PXalf6uy3vQ7aPOPk2I/nSbb8PLPLlsdxpRuNM42Fd2lYCaS9Gg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:43e2:: with SMTP id r89mr23820198pjg.38.1609641979054; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:46:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.11] ([2400:2411:aa20:4300:e98a:6188:5b6d:b1e9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm16475551pjt.32.2021.01.02.18.46.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:46:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 11:46:18 +0900 From: Lemures Lemniscati To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITA] libexif-0.6.22-1 In-Reply-To: <877dovasx2.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <20210101072238.C18E.50F79699@gmail.com> <877dovasx2.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Message-Id: <20210103114614.387E.50F79699@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.75.02 [ja] X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210102-4, 2021/01/03), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 02:46:21 -0000 On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 23:13:45 +0100, Achim Gratz > Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes: > > I agree. And I'll remove the dependency and rebuild. > > Minor nit: IMHO it would have been all-around cleaner if you obsoleted > libexif-common and replaced it with libexif-doc. > I guess if we make libexif-doc package, it would be better to move html document files (104 files), also, from libexiv-devel into libexif-doc. So an expected libexiv-doc will contain /usr/share/doc/libexif/ABOUT-NLS /usr/share/doc/libexif/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/libexif/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/libexif/COPYING /usr/share/doc/libexif/NEWS /usr/share/doc/libexif/README /usr/share/doc/libexif/SECURITY.md and /usr/share/doc/libexif/libexif-api.html/* (104 files). How about this rearrangement? Lem