Re: [ITA] pocl

[Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>]

Hi Jon,

Thanks for revewing.

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 15:48:33 +0000
Jon Turney wrote:
> On 04/01/2024 00:55, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> [...]
> > Any comments and advices will be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks for adopting this.
> 
> > pocl.cygport
> > 
> > inherit clang cmake
> > 
> > NAME="pocl"
> > VERSION=3.1
> > RELEASE=1
> > CATEGORY="Libs"
> > # The entire code is under MIT
> > # include/utlist.h which is under BSD-1-Clause (unbundled)
> > # lib/kernel/vecmath which is under GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later
> > LICENSE="MIT, BSD-1-Clause, GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later"
> 
> I think this is going to fail to validate as an SPDX license expression. 
> The identifiers should be combined with AND and OR (where OR represents 
> a choice, and AND represents compliance with both alternatives is required).

What about "MIT AND BSD-1-Clause AND (GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later)"?
Is "()" allowed?

> When I try to build it fails:
> 
> [449/761] Linking CXX shared module lib/llvmopencl/cygllvmopencl.dll
> FAILED: lib/llvmopencl/cygllvmopencl.dll
> [...]
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpocl: No such file or directory
> clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> invocation)
> 
> I don't know if that means it's looking for the installed rather than 
> just built libpocl there, or something else is wrong.

I cannot reproduce this even if I uninstall libpocl-devel. Umm, what
is the difference?

My environment is as follows.

Cygwin Package Information
Package              Version        Status
binutils             2.41-3         OK
clang                8.0.1-1        OK
cmake                3.25.3-1       OK
cygport              0.36.7-1       OK
ninja                1.11.1-1       OK

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>