From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mta-snd-e02.mail.nifty.com (mta-snd-e02.mail.nifty.com [106.153.226.34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B95385E45D for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 00:48:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C8B95385E45D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C8B95385E45D Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=106.153.226.34 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710550099; cv=none; b=N58OW4tjhXuY/T9JsuLoitzGYN1OMevBdKtKWJnFWoO+mrYlEbLteiHSFZAHCu39nF1tWTiOU7gETemnhl+Ciua8say7dGPFW2si7/HbX1j9yBefp1uAsLoFzs0LHTlEZ9ENI1iiomLjyf/MKB8laW1Vy1xJyVvnmkdwLRYZEtE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710550099; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AKKATpZ5BX1VoclvOz/Txq8+QqBnjtGecIhPwWIkkjE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version; b=wrEJBBpB6/5tLiwnx7N7wLJ2v05aoYPyJKjK4zBOtx9dcWUnJwvD+q3cDb+Ir1ieDax8Yhq4MVZJNreRunUQIRliemU1IZZoxj2Tv8gXtvO1AIq8mQVGlqUZQWkzaVRPoaNJCq0euzZVAHvBGeoVSfMDZqfm36Z6GCC+nKhKc28= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from HP-Z230 by dmta0002.nifty.com with ESMTP id <20240316004815080.BTQB.56322.HP-Z230@nifty.com> for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:48:15 +0900 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:48:13 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Where have svt-av1 1.8.0-2 gone? Message-Id: <20240316094813.eda0fbc36dc487c84c18d794@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20240316093933.6c04181041840aa3a6f9a015@nifty.ne.jp> References: <20240315181507.0db9bf2214841fc6687cdb6c@nifty.ne.jp> <63fcce21-d8e7-40d8-b0db-7ae818ed2116@dronecode.org.uk> <20240315223120.300a9e4dfae6e4569ea87ccb@nifty.ne.jp> <20240316093933.6c04181041840aa3a6f9a015@nifty.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:39:33 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:58:06 +0000 > Jon Turney wrote: > > On 15/03/2024 13:31, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:14:49 +0000 > > > Jon Turney wrote: > > >> On 15/03/2024 09:15, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > >>> I uploaded svt-av1 1.8.0-2 few hours ago, however > > >>> it does not appear on the mirror servers so far. > > >>> > > >>> Was anything wrong? > > >> > > >> Sorry, things will be a little slower than usual (uploads may take up to > > >> 4 hours to get processed) until I get around to fixing up things for > > >> some changes made on sourceware to provide better isolation. > > >> > > >> I see that this upload was declined because svt-av1 2.0.0 already exists. > > >> > > >> I guess you really want to upload it, as it provides a different set of > > >> shared libraries to 2.0.0. Please let me know. > > > > > > 1.8.0-2 is necessary for changing packaging. > > > > I see. I configured the necessary exception, sot his should be all > > uploaded now. > > > > > 1.8.0-1: cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll and cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll are in libsvtav1, > > > However, > > > 2.0.0-1: cygSvtAv1Enc-2.dll and cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll are built. > > > So, I made > > > 1.8.0-2: cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll is in libsvtav1enc1 and cygSvtAv1Dec-0 is in libsvtav1dec0 > > > both obsolete libsvtav1 > > > for migration. > > > > Hmm... maybe your thinking here is not quite clear. > > > > You cannot assume that an installation is upgraded often enough that it > > receives every version of every package. > > > > (And in this case, where 1.8.0-2 appears in the repository after 2.0.0 > > does, it's not going to get automatically installed anywhere) > > > > So, as a principle, every version of a package must contain complete > > instructions for upgrading to it. > > > > > > In this particular case, that means the cygport should contain > > > > libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > > > > for as long as the package produces libsvtav1dec0. > > > > > > (In fact, I think this all happens to work as desired because libsvtav1 > > is also obsoleted by the non-longer produced libsvtav1enc1, but I just > > point this out for completeness) > > What I did was: > 1.8.0-1: > libsvtav1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/*.dll" > > 1.8.0-2: > libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll" > libsvtav1enc1_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" > libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > > 2.0.0-1: > libsvtav1enc2_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-2.dll" > libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" > > This expected: > 1.8.0-1 -> 1.8.0-2 -> 2.0.0-1 > libsvtav1(1.8.0-1) -> libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > -> libsvt1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(2.0.0-2) > > However, this does not seem to work as I expected. > My expectation was that both libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) and libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > are installed for upgrading libsvtav1(1.8.0-1). > > Instead, I found > > 1.8.0-2: > libsvtav1_CATEGORY="_obsolete" > libsvtav1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1enc1 libsvtav1dec0" > libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll" > libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" > > works as expected. > Is it possible to change it like this now? If possible, I can upload fixed 1.8.0-2 (or 1.8.0-3). -- Takashi Yano