From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96381 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2017 07:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 96260 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2017 07:29:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=esteemed, Amazing, banner, *la X-HELO: mail-wr0-f182.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f182.google.com) (209.85.128.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 07:29:24 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r103so213192786wrb.0 for ; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:29:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BvU2Z0Jdaj9KgMMRS3xz8OWC/mlykLCf8DEifPETOtw=; b=Tto9EizcAZv4i4V7fiLMuVqkY75FWgoJRTd/PS2vzqP+o1SMw3EMn3f3C9pM0wf3q8 xCPoR4ZtHqSO/yx5Fzquoh0lRG6GMWVvznwfMAgrbTTORFKlwolrFUk2kTMq38nyTx8s SMR36aRbU6Sv8JCq96LE5tNTdV3k+fFij54QcAPIgmQ1yXhed1OJk/sw4W6Ut6Kdj0r7 o6X+T/s1ycA3HxyoS/Z4KTKQoZu5zn2C/bMbO57KCZcrTAZeyoTF9h7vKguqhfIq04Mx SmRK6l30bQF18OKDGMHPXmKaqD8RLyXbawW7mwG9n37eXqi+rUgndcKczhRJouhc/V1v nnlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwpLuMJtwqRxDSCvnb6VYWPw6uelw0rp0Gh8RhiSTK9AV4LDcC9 yNADKUSmwbO7M/3F X-Received: by 10.223.149.33 with SMTP id 30mr25793364wrs.186.1498894162015; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p4FDB39C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.219.57.199]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k75sm8735468wmh.10.2017.07.01.00.29.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: libtool not finding /usr/lib/libintl.la or what? To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <2dd41143-617a-4695-5a6d-e5bb9ce8f625@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 07:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 01/07/2017 09:18, Mark Geisert wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jul 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 01/07/2017 07:47, Mark Geisert wrote: >>> Esteemed co-conspirators, >>> I've been pulling my hair out trying to build a new cygutils package on >>> 32-bit Cygwin. The exact same source package builds fine on 64-bit but >>> 32-bit fails with the following... >>> >>> CC src/ipc/semstat.o >>> CXX src/cygdrop/src_cygdrop_cygdrop-cygdrop.o >>> CCLD src/cygicons/libicons.la >>> CCLD src/banner/banner.exe >>> libtool: error: cannot find the library '/usr/lib/libintl.la' or >>> unhandled argument '/usr/lib/libintl.la' >> >> it is pulled by /usr/lib/libpopt.la. >> >> >> try >> >> $ cd /usr/lib >> $ mv libpopt.la libpopt.la_bk >> >> and run again make in build > > Amazing. That does work. But what is the correct way to deal with this > when some random user wants to build 32-bit cygutils from source? > Should the build procedure actually do what you suggested? I could not > figure out which package supplies (or used to supply) libintl.la for 32 > bits. > Thanks much, > > ..mark we should remove the not needed /usr/lib/*.la (not all) as we did from start on the 64bit version