From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35568 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2016 17:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 35497 invoked by uid 89); 15 Aug 2016 17:30:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*Ad:U*yselkowitz, Gratz, gratz X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:30:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572D388E60 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.21] (ovpn-116-21.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.21]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7FHU55r028709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:30:06 -0400 Subject: Re: cloog-isl: rebuild or remove? To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <874m6m2d6p.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <33e8edbe-d17a-2017-576b-9ce8a165be3b@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874m6m2d6p.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On 2016-08-15 11:45, Achim Gratz wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz writes: >> All versions of gcc in the distro have been bumped to GCC 5, meaning >> that nothing depends on cloog-isl anymore. Do you plan on rebuilding >> the latter for the latest isl, or should it just be removed? > > I don't think there was ever any other consumer of that library, so I'd > rather drop that package from the distro unless someone needs it. I've > always built it with the exact version that gcc was wanting to have, and > gcc switched to a different library by now. Alright, then I'll remove it once we're sure mingw*-gcc 5.4 is well tested. -- Yaakov